Round brilliant cuts
are the most popular, preferred and brilliant among all the ways in
which a diamond is cut. Over a century of research has revealed that
this cut has the potential for the highest degree of light return. With
an interesting history and vibrant types of cuts,
it is no surprise that 80% sales among specifications all diamonds
being reported to be those of round brilliant cut diamonds. They also
enjoy an indisputably high popularity and various renowned laboratories
set different cut grades for these diamonds. Finally, with the stringent dimensions
that are followed, this cut ensures that many attempts have gone into
cutting a diamond with the best proportions to achieve the highest
degree of brilliance.
What is a round brilliant cut?
A
round brilliant cut diamond is one that has 57 facets, or 58 facets
including a culet . This cut is also known as the American ideal cut ,
old European cut, American standard cut, modern brilliant cut and
brilliant cut. With varying standards of reference, this cut is called
ideal as it works towards the overall purpose of giving a diamond with
maximum fire and scintillation. While the round brilliant cut take
longer cutting time than other cuts and lead to more loss of carat
weight than standard cuts (an 8mm diameter ideal cut diamond weighs
approximately 1.91 carats), these stones are renowned for their ideal
crown, pavilion and girdle symmetries. It is also known that round
brilliant diamonds are usually cut from octahedron crystals and from
small crystals, with the loose stone resembling the shape of a cone.
History of round brilliant cut
This
cut is said to have emerged from the old miner cut or the triple cut
which was popular in the seventeenth century. While these ancient cuts
had all facets similar to the current day round brilliant cut, the
facet alignments were noted to be different. This cut gave direct rise
to the Old European cut on which many experiments were done to define
the perfectness of the current round brilliant. Soon Marcel Tolkowsky,
a renowned Belgian diamond cutter, took up empirical calculations as a
part of his PhD thesis in mathematics and gave the diamond industry the
renowned Tolkowsky cut in 1919.
Types of round brilliant cut
While
the number of facets for round brilliant diamonds is fixed, the
proportions are not. This is what gives range to a wide variety even in
round brilliant diamonds. Currently there are six different ideal cuts
devised over the years. These include the,
American ideal cut
This is also known as the modern round brilliant cut or the Tolkowsky
cut. This cut is the benchmark of ideal cuts in North America. As per
Tolkowsky who, the ideal cut must have a depth percentage of 59%, table
percentage of 53%, crown height of 16%, pavilion angle of 40.75
degrees, crown angle of 34.5 degrees and pavilion depth at 43.1%. While
the Tolkowsky ideal does not specify a girdle, in reality a round
brilliant must have a medium and even girdle thickness to prevent
chipping while the diamond is set. Besides this perfect symmetry, a
minute or absent culet and perfectly aligned facets are pertinent.
Eppler cut
One variation of the modern round brilliant cut is the Eppler (European
Practical Fine cut) which is the standard in Germany and other European
countries. It was discovered in 1939 and is slightly different from the
American ideal cut and is noted to increase the table size by 3%. This
cut has a table size of 56%, crown height of 14.4%, overall height of
57.7%. The reduction in crown height leads to maintaining dispersion
similar to the American ideal.
ScanDN
Scan DN (Scandinavian Diamond Nomenclature) cut is noted to have table
width of 57.5%, overall height of 57.7% and crown height of 14.6%.
Other cuts
Ideal brilliant, Parker Brilliant and Eulitz Brilliant are the other
types of ideal cuts. Among these, the Parker brilliant and Eulitz
brilliant have been disused as the proportions cause low brilliance.
Dimensions of the cut
This
cut has 58 facets, which includes the culet. In cases where the culet
is not present, round brilliants are noted to have 57 facets. The crown
or the upper portion of the diamond comprises of one table facet, 8
bezel facets, 8 star facets and 16 upper girdle facets. Besides these
33 facets, the pavilion or the bottom portion of the diamond comprises
of 16 lower girdle facets, 8 pavilion main facets and one culet. The
dimensions of factors like table size, crown angles and pavilion depth
are taken into consideration while measuring the brilliance of a
diamond. However as per GIA and many other laboratories, it is
considered that other factors like total depth, girdle thickness, culet
size, star facet length, lower girdle facet length, crown height and
finish are taken into consideration while measuring the brilliance of
the diamond. GIA has demonstrated that a slight variation in one factor
can alter the brilliance of the diamond. Among the above dimensions,
GIA reports that the relationship between brilliance of a diamond and
the primary proportion factors of crown angle, pavilion angle and table
size is rather complex. Also a well cut round brilliant needs to have
good balance between fire and brilliance, with the stone reflecting
light upwards and making the diamond appear white. While variations in
any of the above factors affect the brilliance of the diamond in
different ways, these three factors specially produce unusual results.
Here are the specifications.
Table size
GIA specifies a table size of 56% as ideal while AGS notes a range from
53% to 57%. It is noted that as the table size of a diamond changes,
the difference in the brilliance of a diamond is significant, also
affecting the crown height and total depth of the diamond.
Depth percentage
This refers to the total depth of the diamond divided by the overall
diameter. Tolkowsky specifies the standard at 59.3% and it is known
that that this factor is the quickest indicator of quality of cut for a
round brilliant. While a slight increase of up to 62.5% is acceptable,
more increase in depth percentage reduces the brilliance of a diamond.
Crown angle
The crown diffuses light into various colors, and is an important
parameter for the ideal diamond. 34 to 35.5 degrees is considered ideal
for round brilliant diamonds. While a change in the crown angle does
not show any great difference in the face up view, the profile view is
greatly altered, again affecting the crown height and total depth of
the stone.
Star facet length
Set at 50%, a change in this parameter causes great difference in face
up view than in profile view. Also as the crown height and crown angle
are not affected, the change in star facet length is not considered a
pertinent factor for measuring brilliance.
Girdle thickness
Given a quantitative 3% by GIA, more thickness in the girdle increases
the total depth of the diamond. Tolkowsky specifies a no girdle,
however in reality it is required to prevent chipping in a diamond. It
is thus measured at 1% to 2% of total diameter. Further increase in
girdle thickness adds weighted look to a diamond, when it is viewed
with the face up.
Pavilion angle
The pavilion functions by reflecting back the light through the top of
a diamond, and thus slight change in the pavilion angle brings
difference in the profile view. However the pavilion up view is not
affected by minute changes. Pavilion depth and total depth are affected
by changes in the pavilion angle.
Culet size
A pointed culet or the absence of a culet is considered the best for
ideal diamonds. A wider culet is seen to bring about a marked
difference in how the pavilion appears. Both total depth and pavilion
depth are affected by changes in this parameter.
Besides
the above factors, the overall diameter of a diamond is also a quick
indicator of its brilliance. A round brilliant diamond must have a
diameter (in millimeters) equal to 6.5 times the cube root of its carat
weight. For example, a diamond of 1 carat must have a diameter of
6.5mm.
Cut grade for round brilliant diamonds
Different
laboratories grade diamonds differently. The differences of grading
used by a few of the laboratories are specified as under, both in
quantitative and qualitative form.
GIA
The GIA diamond lab ideals have
fixed reference values. It bases its cut grade for round brilliant
diamonds on its experience of fifteen years, sophisticated computer
modeling technologies like ray tracing and thousands of observations.
Its cut grades fall in the categories of excellent, very good, good,
fair and poor. Approximately 99% of diamonds graded at GIA come in the
top three categories. Elements of physical design such as weight,
durability and craftsmanship are also taken into consideration. GIA
also uses its trademarked GIA Facetware products like cut estimators to
ensure that results are predictable. GIA round cut diamonds are also featured in our search resutls.
AGS
Unlike GIA, AGS provides a range within which values are acceptable.
Grades here are based on its five years of research on the light
performance in diamonds. The distance of the diamond from the eye is
noted to be at 25cms. The laboratory uses their AGS Performance Grading
Software, the first of its kind to be used for round brilliant
diamonds. It grades all 58 facets of round brilliants and measures them
in three dimensions (most other labs grades diamonds on two-dimensional
basis). The three factors of polish, symmetry and proportions are taken
into consideration while grading. Triple ideal grading is awarded when
all three parameters are in harmony. Instead of stringently quantifying
different facet angles and facet ratios, the laboratory provides
grading depending on where different facets intersect. AGS round cut diamonds are also featured in our search results.
Other diamond laboratories
These include labs like AGA and HCA. Amongst these, the standards of
AGA are considered overtly strict. HCA on the other hand, is said to
have altered its standards in 2004, to distinguish between brilliant
and Tolkowsky. The specifications are measured based on a distance of
40cms from the eyes.
Standard specifications by a few laboratories are given as under,
|
|
GIA
|
AGS
|
|
Crown angle
|
34 degrees
|
34 to 35.5 degrees
|
|
Table size
|
56%
|
53% to 57% of table diameter
|
|
Total depth
|
|
58% to 63% of diameter
|
|
Star facet length
|
50%
|
|
|
Culet size
|
0.5%
|
|
|
Pavilion angle
|
40.5 degrees
|
42.5% to 43.5%
|
|
Culet
|
|
Pointed, very small to small
|
|
Girdle thickness
|
3%
|
Medium to slightly thick
|
|
Grading given
|
Excellent, Very good
|
0,1
|
Different
laboratories also use different kinds of sophisticated equipment to
measure the cut quality. These include H&A viewers, BrilliantScope,
Idealscope, FireTrace and SarinDimension.
While
the ideal cut is very desirable, the definition of such a cut is quite
subjective and often a matter of controversy amongst many diamond
experts. With various theories existing on the ideal cut and its proper
parameters, quality and technique of cut are vital factors. These not
only make a diamond look bigger than it actually is, but also give it
more brilliance. The basis on which customers decide the right ideal
diamond is to judge how beautiful it looks. While the round brilliant
cut is both desirable as it is expensive, beauty lies in many other
cuts also. Judge each stone by its merits and not with technical
jargon. This is what will make the purchase of a breathtaking diamond
very easy.
Here is a collection of excellend round diamond cut featured in our search results.
|